blog blogblog blog blog. BLOG!
                               

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Is Karl Pilkington Real?

Debate has been raging on the internet over the authenticity of Karl Pilkington, the Ricky Gervais Show co-host whose idiotic ramblings are fodder for the scorn of Gervais and Steven Merchant.

Matt (aka Sasquatch) over at ASpecialThing breaks it down, and quite reasonably, I think:

No one's saying he's completely oblivious to the fact that people find his idiotic ramblings funny -- obviously he's smart enough to know that if the way he's acting and talking makes a world-famous comedian laugh and want to keep talking to him, then he should keep it up. That's not even smarts, that's human nature: when you crave attention (as every human does to some degree) and a certain behavior results in you getting attention, you will keep up that behavior and even amplify it (kids and bad comics do this all the time, which is why they're annoying).

Does he really believe every bit of Monkey News? No. But he believes some of it, and believed a lot of it at some point I bet -- now it's a segment they have to fill, and he understands his role is to read the stuff as if he thinks it's real. Is that "doing a character?" If it is, then every person is doing a character at some point in his life, whenever he has to tell a white lie to spare someone's feelings or pretend to be excited by a project at work that is, in fact, total crap. That said, some people are inconceivably gullible and believe everything they read until someone points out the inconsistencies. I think Karl could be one of those people. Above all, he WANTS to believe stupid urban myths and conspiracy theories.

Bottom line: he is self-aware and understands his place on the show, so he gives Gervais, Merchant and the audience what he knows they all want, even if it's an exaggeration of his personality. Even if it means taking the abuse he's given for his views without complaint.


Character or not, Pilkington is a hoot, and the Ricky Gervais Show is very, very funny.

Like this post? Click here to subscribe to the blog.

12 Comments:

Blogger Martin Degrell said...

The only evidence I need are the early XFM shows. I defy anyone to listen to those shows and still claim Karl is some kind of Kaufmanesque character.

It's very interesting to listen to the early shows and hear how Karl gets more and more involved, from being little more than a sound guy ("producer" is stretching it) to the centre of attention he is now.

February 28, 2006 3:21 PM  
Anonymous slow said...

Isn't $1.95 a silly price for a half hour of dicking around? Even from the worlds funniest man? I dick around most of the day, and I've never considered charging myself or my office mates for the service. Case in point, check out what a google video search for "Shut your hate hole" brought up:

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=shut+your+hate+hole

Or don't, because its scary religious stuff about how god wants to know you.

Hip hip... (say it!)
Hip hip...

Slow

February 28, 2006 4:46 PM  
Blogger Jesse Thorn said...

I'm just surprised they went to a pay model rather than selling a sponsorship. I agree that it's really more the kind of thing you would love to get for free, rather than the kind of thing you'd pay for.

Honestly, though, if Guardian couldn't get the $$ together to pay them, they really blew a big opportunity. They have ad salespeople! Why weren't they selling??

February 28, 2006 4:58 PM  
Blogger Jeff T said...

I can't wait to download it for free off bittorrent. I've heard most of the XFM days, Karl is very real and my impression is that it is less "play'n it up" then Matt (aka Sasquatch) thinks.

March 01, 2006 1:27 PM  
Blogger Jesse Thorn said...

Regarding bittorrent, I would never endorse, much less repeatedly do, that. That's "stealing."

Re: Pilkington, there must be playing it up involved. Sometimes he's having fun with them as they're having fun with him. But I don't think it's a character, because often Gervais will try to manipulate what KP has said, and KP will call foul.

March 01, 2006 1:37 PM  
Anonymous slowthinking said...

For the most part I agree with you about bittorrent. However, my frustration with not being able to purchase and view "Extras" got the better of me and my good citizen tendencies. Unfortunately, this laps of morality did snow ball, and I now find myself doing the old "pump and run" at least once a week. It has gotten so bad that I could not help myself from insinuating, in this very post, that by "pump and run" I meant that I pump up my bike tires and go for a jog. But really I wanted to make an inappropriate joke about sex with old ladies and getting lost before they wake up, but I did not have the skill. And I'm still typing. This is pathetic. Did I steal that pump and run shit from somewhere? I think I might have...

I hang my head in shame.

Slow

March 01, 2006 7:55 PM  
Blogger Jesse Thorn said...

Again... I would NEVER EVER EVER download illegally from the internet. NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER. As a person who doesn't have cable, WHY WOULD I? I can just watch 2 1/2 Men. So, in conclusion, DOWNLOADING IS WRONG, and I don't even know what "Azureus" means.

March 01, 2006 8:20 PM  
Blogger David Lifton said...

What convinced me that Karl is real are his attempts to justify his thoughts. Even if there are gaps missing, there is a linear logic to them. If he was playing a character and merely improvising it, he would have to be on the comedic wavelength of Jonathan Winter or Robin Williams to come up with that stuff. And Stephen and Ricky's reactions wouldn't be as genuine.

And, as a fan of Liverpool Football Club, I also have little difficult in believing that a Manc can be that thick.

March 02, 2006 8:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can conclusively tell you the whole show is discussed at length before going out, and parts are scripted. Also - shock! - Pilkington doesn't write his diary. Not expecting anyone to believe me because I don't have the inclination to justify the position of authority from which I speak.

It doesn't make it any less funny, in my opinion.

March 26, 2006 12:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Also, take note that whilst Karl is doing monkey news, he is well aware that the other 2 have caught on that it is crap, and yet he continues without EVER explaining a single previous thing mentioned..
eg instead of going back and saying "no its true because..." Karl pushes on, aware that the segment is a filler and concious of the fact that he must simply do it every show

July 12, 2006 11:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can conclusively tell you the whole show is discussed at length before going out, and parts are scripted. Also - shock! - Pilkington doesn't write his diary. Not expecting anyone to believe me because I don't have the inclination to justify the position of authority from which I speak.

- Then why say anything at all? You know what i mean? What use is that comment to anyone but the extremely gullible? 2 years ago i know but every so often you run across something on the internet so asinine that it compels you to respond. You're probably never gonna see this OP but i just had to.

February 23, 2008 4:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your such a twat either u believe he's real or u dont!If u dont expose him unquestinably!

July 31, 2008 7:51 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home









"Rust, a fungus disease, sapped the wheat crop. Production of durum wheat dropped from the 10-year average of 31,547,000 bushels a year to 4,976,000 bushels."