Time Out for Earnestness

I actively avoid politics in public. I am a deeply politically engaged person, but I think The Sound of Young America and Jordan, Jesse Go! aren't the venue for my opinions. I occasionally hear from someone who thinks Jordan and I don't care about political or social issues, because we don't engage them on the show, or that I don't care because I rarely book explicitly political artists on The Sound. That's not the case, but I think there are others who cover that territory better than I, and I would rather offer a big tent than alienate folks who may not share my political values.
So, fair warning: I am about to be personal, political and earnest. You are welcome to ignore me if you so choose, and please understand that these views don't have to do with the editorial perspective of this blog, or my shows. Just me, personally. I also understand that reasonable people can disagree.
That said...
This is a presidential election year, and there has rightly been a lot of focus on presidential politics. Here in California, however, there is an issue which for me, personally, supersedes the presidential election: Proposition 8.
California Proposition 8 would amend the state's constitution to eliminate same-sex couples' recently affirmed constitutional right to marry.
One of the most important roles of our state and federal constitutions is to protect the rights of minorities. In a democracy, the majority rules, but on rare occasion, that majority can trample the rights and freedoms of a group which is smaller in number. One of the few things that can stand in the way of the trampling are the rights guaranteed to all in the central documents that guide our civil society. Maybe the majority didn't care for Brown v. Board of Education in the mid 1950s, but the constitution of our country guaranteed certain inalienable rights, and they didn't just guarantee them if the majority happened to agree.
When the state supreme court of California decided earlier this year that same sex couples had the same right to marriage as any other couple, it was a watershed decision that illustrated why we grant certain rights to all people, not just majorities. It was a decision that said, "these people, whether they are a majority or not, deserve equality." Proposition 8 takes the remarkable step of re-writing our state constitution to explicitly eliminate the rights of a minority. From my perspective, this is unconscionable.
This isn't just an abstract issue. Two of the couples who've been closest to me, family-wise, in my life, are same-sex. My aunt Gail and her partner Deb have been together for more than 20 years. They share an really amazing, vibrant love, and I'm so proud to have Deb as an Aunt. My own parents were married only briefly, and I've always seen Gail and Deb as a model of long-term romantic love. They respect and honor each other, love each other deeply, and are deeply committed to each other.
My mother's best friend, Eric, has been with his partner, Steve for twenty years. In fact, about two months ago, they got married on their 20th anniversary, with my mother serving as a maid of honor. Like my aunts, Eric and Steve are as committed as a couple could be. Steve's health has been poor for many years, and Eric has stood by him steadfastly. They appreciate each others greatest qualities and accept each others greatest failings. Their bond is as strong as any, and again, it is a model to me of how love can really work.
I got married recently, and I almost cried a few times thinking of my family members who could now share this right with me, because the supreme court of my state had affirmed it. Now, though, I'm terrified that it will be taken away.
If your church does not perform or honor same-sex marriages, I disagree, but I also respect its right to make that choice. I can understand that some people are members of faiths which considered homosexuality a sin. I disagree, but I believe it is their right to make that choice. The religious component of a marriage, whatever it may be for a given couple, should not be determined or proscribed by the state.
But let's be clear: we're not talking about what goes on in churches. We're talking about the law. Same sex couples deserve the same rights under the law as you or I. The right to marry in their own church, or in a courthouse or by some other non-religious officiant. The right to live, legally, as a married couple, with all the benefits and responsibilities that go with that.
All same-sex couples in are asking for is equality. They don't want to make anyone else gay. They don't want to do anything to my straight marriage. They just want to live as equals under the law.
When two of my wife's closest friends, Anna and Abby, were married a year ago in Massachusetts, one of the maids of honor made a toast to all the same-sex couples who couldn't share in the right Anna and Abby were enjoying by virtue of geography. I was thinking of my own state then, and that toast was the first thing I thought of when the court asserted that same-sex marriage was legal in my state. I was so happy for my family and friends who could marry, and I was so excited about the future. Now, all of that is gravely threatened.
If you agree, and live in California, I urge you to vote. Vote now, if you can, vote on election day, just vote. Your vote matters, and the race is very close.
Whether or not you live in California, you can help. Take action with No on 8, or with the Human Rights Campaign. Give, even a little bit, to help spread the word about what this measure is really about: using our state constitution, for the first time, to enshrine a denial of human rights.
Okay, I hope you'll forgive this digression into painful earnestness. It's my last word on the election. More comedy videos and stuff soon, I promise.
Labels: personal
Like this post? Click here to subscribe to the blog.
















16 Comments:
Hi Jesse, I'm a new-ish fan of the podcast but I just wanted to remind you that the state of Florida also has a similar amendment proposal on the ballot, Amendment 2. Prop 8 is getting a lot of attention, but unfortunately it seems that amendment 2 in Florida is getting very little attention.
That was well said, Jesse. Thank you.
Well said, brother.
Thank you for a great post. I am going to point out a typo only because it completely changes the meaning of the sentence. You wrote "If your church does not honor same-sex marriages, I disagree, but I also respect it's right to make that choice." I think you mean to say "its right", because otherwise you would be saying that a church is right to make that choice rather than it has the right to make that choice.
As for me, I never really considered the value of marriage until i was unable to help my partner in part because we were not married. Marriage to me now is about being able to take care of those you love as much as you possibly can, and how can we deny anyone that?
Earnestness needs a comeback. Thanks.
Good Luck with the striking down the proposition. If you guys succeed I can see us up here in WA being among the next to open it up to discussion. Hopefully after us "Blue States" get it done the rest of the country will follow suit.
Thanks Jesse. I was one of the people that jumped onto your earnestness-in-the-service-of-gay-rights on twitter a long time ago, but I hope you know that I, and a lot of other gay listeners/readers really appreciate that you care enough to make your voice heard. It's stuff like this from caring straight allies like yourself that shows this isn't just a gay issue, but a human issue. Thank you for helping to bring the light.
You are a great man, Jesse.
You've always been good, and very much so, but right now you are great.
Bravo Jesse.
That was some wonderful, old school sincerity full of sound logic and appropriate emotion. Very well said, thanks.
Thanks, Jesse. Here in DC, the city council is considering passing a same-sex marriage bill; but, because we remain under the thumb of our evil Congressional overlords, it may not happen if Democrats in Congress are spooked by Prop 8 passing. In other words, you West-coast Godless sodomites, do your East-coast brethren a solid and vote no.
In Arizona, the initiative is Prop 102 "Definition of Marriage."
I intend to vote no and deeply hope the majority of voters do so as well.
awesome! Thank you for posting this!
I read the post to all my students and sent copies to faculty members who can read it to theirs, in turn. One student, in hiphop, who is older and quite amazing in his own way stood up in tears and said Tell Jesse I said thank you. I am gay and I am grateful someone cares. mpm
I just voted no on amendment 2, and I also voted down a law that was created to screw chinese americans from owning property or give that property to their children.
We're the last state to do that, which is both good and unsettling at the same time.
I find it pathetic that opposition to homosexuality hides their bigotry behind the excuse of a word's definition.
If you're going to try to force your irrational hatred onto to the American people, at least have the balls to come out and admit it.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home